Editorial Workflow
-
Manuscript Submission
Authors submit their manuscript through the journal’s online submission system in accordance with the prescribed author guidelines. -
Initial Editorial Screening
The Editorial Office conducts a preliminary evaluation to assess:-
Scope relevance
-
Formatting and completeness
-
Language quality
-
Plagiarism and ethical compliance
-
-
Desk Rejection (if applicable)
Manuscripts found to be plagiarized, copied, out of scope, or not meeting minimum quality standards are rejected at this stage, and authors are notified accordingly. -
Acceptance for Peer Review
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening and are confirmed to be original are accepted for review and forwarded to the Editorial Board. -
Editorial Board Assessment
The Editorial Board evaluates the manuscript for academic merit, originality, and relevance, and provides initial comments or recommendations. -
Peer Review Process
The manuscript is assigned to independent expert reviewers who conduct a detailed evaluation and submit their comments and recommendations. -
Reviewer Feedback to Authors
The Editorial Office compiles the reviewers’ comments and communicates them to the author(s). -
Revision by Author(s)
Authors revise the manuscript in accordance with the reviewers’ and editors’ comments and resubmit the revised version within the stipulated timeframe. -
Re-evaluation (if required)
Revised manuscripts may be re-examined by the reviewers or Editorial Board to ensure that all concerns have been adequately addressed. -
Final Decision
Based on the reviewers’ recommendations and editorial assessment, the manuscript is either:-
Accepted for publication, or
-
Requested for further revision, or
-
Rejected.
-
-
Acceptance for Publication
Once accepted, the manuscript proceeds to the production stage. -
Publication
The final, accepted article is published online in the journal and made available under the journal’s open-access policy.
